San Fernando, CA vs West Valley City, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
San Fernando
65.7
#1616 nationally
West Valley City
67.4
#1434 nationally
San Fernando leads in walk score (79 vs 36). West Valley City leads in cost of living index (110 vs 150). West Valley City leads in average commute (21.9 min vs 29.5 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | San Fernando, CA | West Valley City, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.7 (#1616) | 67.4 (#1434) |
| Population | 23,364 | 134,470 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $752,797 | $472,174 |
| Median Household Income | $70,950 | $81,719 |
| Average Commute | 29.5 min | 21.9 min |
| Walk Score | 79 | 36 |
| Crime Level | 9.9 | 12.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 150 | 110 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+10.2 |
D
65.7 Score
San Fernando, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$752,797
Population
23,364
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
79
Pacific
View San Fernando, CA →
D+
67.4 Score
West Valley City, UT
Mid-size Utah city with community character
Median Home
$472,174
Population
134,470
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
36
West
View West Valley City, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap San Fernando for: