Simi Valley, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Simi Valley
67.3
#1445 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Simi Valley leads in crime level (3.5 vs 6.3). Taylorsville leads in cost of living index (111 vs 176). Simi Valley leads in median household income ($112,144 vs $81,417).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Simi Valley, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.3 (#1445) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 125,113 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $841,774 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $112,144 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 28.4 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 39 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 3.5 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 176 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+15.1 | D+10.2 |
D+
67.3 Score
Simi Valley, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$841,774
Population
125,113
Crime
Low
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Simi Valley, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Simi Valley for: