South Pasadena, CA vs Stamford, CT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
Stamford
68.1
#1350 nationally
Stamford leads in cost of living index (138 vs 228). South Pasadena leads in median household income ($127,882 vs $99,654). South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 57).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | South Pasadena, CA | Stamford, CT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.6 (#1760) | 68.1 (#1350) |
| Population | 25,623 | 135,892 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,707,701 | $728,197 |
| Median Household Income | $127,882 | $99,654 |
| Average Commute | 30.6 min | 28.4 min |
| Walk Score | 67 | 57 |
| Crime Level | 5.8 | Moderate-Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 7.2 |
| Cost of Living Index | 228 | 138 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | N/A |
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
D+
68.1 Score
Stamford, CT
Corporate headquarters with urban revival
Median Home
$728,197
Population
135,892
Crime
Moderate-Low
Schools
B
Northeast
View Stamford, CT →
Try a different matchup
Swap South Pasadena for: