South Pasadena, CA vs Waltham, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
Waltham
66.7
#1517 nationally
Waltham leads in cost of living index (164 vs 228). Waltham leads in average commute (24.6 min vs 30.6 min). South Pasadena leads in crime level (5.8 vs 6.9).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | South Pasadena, CA | Waltham, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.6 (#1760) | 66.7 (#1517) |
| Population | 25,623 | 64,477 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,707,701 | $831,292 |
| Median Household Income | $127,882 | $113,443 |
| Average Commute | 30.6 min | 24.6 min |
| Walk Score | 67 | 57 |
| Crime Level | 5.8 | 6.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 228 | 164 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+39.5 |
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
D
66.7 Score
Waltham, MA
Massachusetts community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$831,292
Population
64,477
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
57
Northeast
View Waltham, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap South Pasadena for: