South Pasadena, CA vs Washington, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
Washington
70.3
#1120 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 15). Washington leads in average commute (15.4 min vs 30.6 min). Washington leads in cost of living index (122 vs 228).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | South Pasadena, CA | Washington, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.6 (#1760) | 70.3 (#1120) |
| Population | 25,623 | 33,877 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,707,701 | $543,808 |
| Median Household Income | $127,882 | $94,655 |
| Average Commute | 30.6 min | 15.4 min |
| Walk Score | 67 | 15 |
| Crime Level | 5.8 | 4.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 228 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+52.3 |
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
C-
70.3 Score
Washington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$543,808
Population
33,877
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
15
West
View Washington, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap South Pasadena for: