Baldwin Park, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $76,002). Rancho Cucamonga leads in crime level (8.0 vs 11.1). Baldwin Park leads in walk score (55 vs 41).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 68,806 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+2.1 |
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: