Chino, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chino
63
#1802 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Chino leads in walk score (44 vs 41). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $99,385). Rancho Cucamonga leads in average commute (33 min vs 34.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chino, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63 (#1802) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 93,114 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $755,615 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $99,385 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 34.2 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 8.2 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 154 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+2.1 |
D
63 Score
Chino, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$755,615
Population
93,114
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
44
Pacific
View Chino, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Chino for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: