Banning, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $54,083). Rancho Cucamonga leads in crime level (8.0 vs 12.8). Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 29).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 31,680 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | R+2.1 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Banning for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: