Bothell, WA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bothell
65.7
#1610 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Bothell leads in crime level (3.0 vs 8.0). Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 29). Bothell leads in median household income ($127,944 vs $105,534).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bothell, WA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.7 (#1610) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 50,213 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,015,871 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $127,944 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 30.2 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 3.0 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 162 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+51.7 | R+2.1 |
D
65.7 Score
Bothell, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,015,871
Population
50,213
Crime
Low
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Bothell, WA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bothell for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: