Cedar Hill, TX vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cedar Hill
72.6
#855 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 19). Cedar Hill leads in crime level (4.9 vs 8.0). Cedar Hill leads in cost of living index (105 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cedar Hill, TX | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.6 (#855) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 48,411 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $315,424 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $84,132 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 32 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 19 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 4.9 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+22.2 | R+2.1 |
C-
72.6 Score
Cedar Hill, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$315,424
Population
48,411
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
19
Southwest
View Cedar Hill, TX →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cedar Hill for: