Champlin, MN vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Champlin
76.2
#369 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in walk score (28 vs 20). Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 3.2). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 26.6 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Champlin, MN | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.2 (#369) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 22,856 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $379,177 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $113,570 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 26.6 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 20 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 3.2 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 112 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+42.6 | R+24.9 |
C
76.2 Score
Champlin, MN
Small Minnesota city with local appeal
Median Home
$379,177
Population
22,856
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
Midwest
View Champlin, MN →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →