Champlin, MN vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Champlin
76.2
#369 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Champlin leads in crime level (3.2 vs 8.0). Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 20). Champlin leads in cost of living index (112 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Champlin, MN | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.2 (#369) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 22,856 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $379,177 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $113,570 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 26.6 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 20 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 3.2 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 112 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+42.6 | R+2.1 |
C
76.2 Score
Champlin, MN
Small Minnesota city with local appeal
Median Home
$379,177
Population
22,856
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
Midwest
View Champlin, MN →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Champlin for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: