Claremont, CA vs Pico Rivera, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Claremont
61.8
#1888 nationally
Pico Rivera
62.5
#1852 nationally
Claremont leads in median household income ($115,091 vs $82,539). Pico Rivera leads in walk score (59 vs 48). Pico Rivera leads in cost of living index (148 vs 173).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Claremont, CA | Pico Rivera, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.8 (#1888) | 62.5 (#1852) |
| Population | 35,640 | 59,189 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,037,849 | $753,964 |
| Median Household Income | $115,091 | $82,539 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 30.8 min |
| Walk Score | 48 | 59 |
| Crime Level | 13.7 | 12.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 173 | 148 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+32.9 |
D-
61.8 Score
Claremont, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,037,849
Population
35,640
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Claremont, CA →
D-
62.5 Score
Pico Rivera, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$753,964
Population
59,189
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
59
Pacific
View Pico Rivera, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Claremont for: