Cliffside Park, NJ vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cliffside Park
70.5
#1093 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Cliffside Park leads in crime level (3.5 vs 8.0). Cliffside Park leads in walk score (83 vs 41). Rancho Cucamonga leads in average commute (33 min vs 37.8 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cliffside Park, NJ | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.5 (#1093) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 25,570 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $637,178 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $96,734 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 37.8 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 83 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 3.5 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+3.4 | R+2.1 |
C-
70.5 Score
Cliffside Park, NJ
Small New Jersey city with local appeal
Median Home
$637,178
Population
25,570
Crime
Low
Walk Score
83
Northeast
View Cliffside Park, NJ →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cliffside Park for: