Elmwood Park, NJ vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Elmwood Park
62
#1879 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Elmwood Park leads in walk score (56 vs 41). Elmwood Park leads in crime level (6.1 vs 8.0). Elmwood Park leads in average commute (25.7 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Elmwood Park, NJ | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62 (#1879) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 21,256 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $628,943 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $84,578 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 25.7 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 56 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 6.1 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 136 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+3.4 | R+2.1 |
Data coverage note: Elmwood Park is missing data for 1 metric that Rancho Cucamonga has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D-
62 Score
Elmwood Park, NJ
Small New Jersey city with local appeal
Median Home
$628,943
Population
21,256
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
56
Northeast
View Elmwood Park, NJ →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Elmwood Park for: