Fate, TX vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fate
73.8
#671 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Fate leads in crime level (1.6 vs 8.0). Fate leads in cost of living index (120 vs 159). Fate leads in median household income ($121,935 vs $105,534).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fate, TX | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.8 (#671) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 24,626 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $359,854 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $121,935 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 35 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 41 |
| Crime Level | 1.6 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 120 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+40.9 | R+2.1 |
Data coverage note: Fate is missing data for 1 metric that Rancho Cucamonga has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C
73.8 Score
Fate, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$359,854
Population
24,626
Crime
Low
Median Income
$121,935
Southwest
View Fate, TX →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fate for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: