Fremont, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fremont
66.8
#1497 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Fremont leads in median household income ($155,342 vs $105,534). Rancho Cucamonga leads in cost of living index (159 vs 185). Fremont leads in walk score (42 vs 41).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fremont, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.8 (#1497) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 230,504 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,471,931 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $155,342 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 32.4 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 42 | 41 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 8.0 |
| School Rating | 9 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 185 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | R+2.1 |
D
66.8 Score
Fremont, CA
East Bay family haven
Median Home
$1,471,931
Population
230,504
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Pacific
View Fremont, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fremont for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: