Grapevine, TX vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grapevine
70.5
#1095 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Grapevine leads in crime level (4.9 vs 8.0). Grapevine leads in average commute (22.5 min vs 33 min). Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 30).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grapevine, TX | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.5 (#1095) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 50,928 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $554,188 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $107,165 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 22.5 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 30 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 4.9 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 123 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+5.1 | R+2.1 |
C-
70.5 Score
Grapevine, TX
Texas community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$554,188
Population
50,928
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
30
Southwest
View Grapevine, TX →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Grapevine for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: