Irvine, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Irvine leads in average commute (25.8 min vs 33 min). Rancho Cucamonga leads in cost of living index (159 vs 178). Irvine leads in median household income ($116,519 vs $105,534).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 307,670 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 41 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 8.0 |
| School Rating | 9.5 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | R+2.1 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Irvine for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: