Lathrop, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lathrop
61.6
#1896 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 29). Rancho Cucamonga leads in average commute (33 min vs 42.9 min). Lathrop leads in cost of living index (142 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lathrop, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.6 (#1896) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 39,857 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $632,887 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $108,732 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 42.9 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 142 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+0.9 | R+2.1 |
D-
61.6 Score
Lathrop, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$632,887
Population
39,857
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lathrop, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Lathrop for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: