Mauldin, SC vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Mauldin
73.5
#725 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 20). Mauldin leads in cost of living index (100 vs 159). Mauldin leads in average commute (21.4 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Mauldin, SC | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.5 (#725) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 28,010 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $299,697 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $75,565 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 21.4 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 20 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 100 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+22.2 | R+2.1 |
C
73.5 Score
Mauldin, SC
Small South Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$299,697
Population
28,010
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
20
Southeast
View Mauldin, SC →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Mauldin for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: