Mount Pleasant, SC vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Mount Pleasant
67.1
#1462 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Mount Pleasant leads in crime level (3.5 vs 8.0). Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 22). Mount Pleasant leads in average commute (25.2 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Mount Pleasant, SC | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.1 (#1462) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 95,232 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $881,446 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $115,167 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 25.2 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 22 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 3.5 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 140 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+5.7 | R+2.1 |
D+
67.1 Score
Mount Pleasant, SC
South Carolina community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$881,446
Population
95,232
Crime
Low
Walk Score
22
Southeast
View Mount Pleasant, SC →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Mount Pleasant for: