Pinellas Park, FL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pinellas Park
72.9
#813 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $62,306). Pinellas Park leads in cost of living index (104 vs 159). Pinellas Park leads in average commute (23 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pinellas Park, FL | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.9 (#813) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 53,456 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $305,323 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $62,306 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 23 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 40 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 6.4 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 104 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+5.2 | R+2.1 |
C-
72.9 Score
Pinellas Park, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$305,323
Population
53,456
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
40
Southeast
View Pinellas Park, FL →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Pinellas Park for: