Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Stuart, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Stuart
66.3
#1563 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $61,878). Stuart leads in cost of living index (109 vs 159). Stuart leads in average commute (23.2 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Stuart, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63 (#1806) | 66.3 (#1563) |
| Population | 174,405 | 19,430 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $788,806 | $375,621 |
| Median Household Income | $105,534 | $61,878 |
| Average Commute | 33 min | 23.2 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 8.0 | 8.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 159 | 109 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+31.1 |
Data coverage note: Stuart is missing data for 1 metric that Rancho Cucamonga has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
D
66.3 Score
Stuart, FL
Small Florida city with local appeal
Median Home
$375,621
Population
19,430
Crime
Moderate
Median Income
$61,878
Southeast
View Stuart, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: