Siloam Springs, AR vs Sterling Heights, MI
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Siloam Springs
69.2
#1245 nationally
Sterling Heights
72.7
#851 nationally
Sterling Heights leads in crime level (6.3 vs 13.6). Siloam Springs leads in average commute (19.6 min vs 26 min). Sterling Heights leads in median household income ($75,381 vs $59,911).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Siloam Springs, AR | Sterling Heights, MI |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.2 (#1245) | 72.7 (#851) |
| Population | 19,336 | 133,306 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $286,237 | $313,695 |
| Median Household Income | $59,911 | $75,381 |
| Average Commute | 19.6 min | 26 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 33 |
| Crime Level | 13.6 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 91 | 101 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+27.0 | R+13.7 |
Data coverage note: Siloam Springs is missing data for 1 metric that Sterling Heights has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D+
69.2 Score
Siloam Springs, AR
Small Arkansas city with local appeal
Median Home
$286,237
Population
19,336
Crime
Moderate-High
Median Income
$59,911
Southwest
View Siloam Springs, AR →
C-
72.7 Score
Sterling Heights, MI
Mid-size Michigan city with community character
Median Home
$313,695
Population
133,306
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Midwest
View Sterling Heights, MI →
Try a different matchup
Swap Siloam Springs for: