Margate, FL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Margate
69.4
#1219 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $56,324). Margate leads in cost of living index (110 vs 159). Margate leads in average commute (28.9 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Margate, FL | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.4 (#1219) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 58,593 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $322,588 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $56,324 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 28.9 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 7.1 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 110 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+17.0 | R+2.1 |
D+
69.4 Score
Margate, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$322,588
Population
58,593
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
37
Southeast
View Margate, FL →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Margate for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: