Parkland, FL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Parkland
65.9
#1601 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 13). Parkland leads in crime level (3.2 vs 8.0). Parkland leads in median household income ($188,544 vs $105,534).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Parkland, FL | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.9 (#1601) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 37,911 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,070,470 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $188,544 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 30.9 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 13 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 3.2 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 171 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+17.0 | R+2.1 |
D
65.9 Score
Parkland, FL
Small Florida city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,070,470
Population
37,911
Crime
Low
Walk Score
13
Southeast
View Parkland, FL →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Parkland for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: