Prosper, TX vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Prosper
67.6
#1405 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Prosper leads in crime level (1.5 vs 8.0). Prosper leads in median household income ($178,224 vs $105,534). Prosper leads in cost of living index (141 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Prosper, TX | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.6 (#1405) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 41,660 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $770,217 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $178,224 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 32.1 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 41 |
| Crime Level | 1.5 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | R+2.1 |
Data coverage note: Prosper is missing data for 1 metric that Rancho Cucamonga has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D+
67.6 Score
Prosper, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$770,217
Population
41,660
Crime
Low
Median Income
$178,224
Southwest
View Prosper, TX →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Prosper for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: