McKinney, TX vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 24). McKinney leads in cost of living index (111 vs 159). McKinney leads in average commute (30.2 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | McKinney, TX | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.5 (#726) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 208,867 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $480,265 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $108,542 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 30.2 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 24 | 41 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 8.0 |
| School Rating | 8.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | R+2.1 |
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap McKinney for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: