Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Santa Fe Springs, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Santa Fe Springs
55
#1960 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in crime level (8.0 vs 24.8). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $81,500). Santa Fe Springs leads in average commute (30.8 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Santa Fe Springs, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63 (#1806) | 55 (#1960) |
| Population | 174,405 | 20,174 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $788,806 | $784,501 |
| Median Household Income | $105,534 | $81,500 |
| Average Commute | 33 min | 30.8 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 8.0 | 24.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 159 | 151 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | D+32.9 |
Data coverage note: Santa Fe Springs is missing data for 1 metric that Rancho Cucamonga has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
F
55 Score
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$784,501
Population
20,174
Crime
High
Median Income
$81,500
Pacific
View Santa Fe Springs, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: